Here’s The Video Of My Energy Humanism Speech At The ARC Conference In London
My message: Be pro-energy, be pro-human, and don’t you ever apologize for it.
Last week’s Alliance For Responsible Citizenship conference in London was quite an event. There were more than 4,000 attendees from 90 countries. There were a number of great speakers, including Philippa Stroud, Bjorn Lomborg, Matt Ridley, Oliver Anthony, Scott Tinker, Sabin Howard, and many others. I was honored to deliver a keynote on energy realism and energy humanism.
ARC just posted the video of my speech on YouTube. I am happy with how it came out. Please like it and share it. Thanks 1,000,000.
Speaking of London (Part One)
Last Friday, I sat down with Freddy Gray at The Spectator’s office in Westminster to record an episode of the Americano podcast. We talked about the collapse of the EV market, Britain’s disastrous energy policies, energy humanism, and the tectonic political changes in the US and Europe on climate policy.
It was great fun. Have a listen:
Speaking of London (Part Two)
The tectonic shifts are evident, and this headline from the BBC on Wednesday provides further proof:
The temerity of those pesky shareholders who want a return on their investment!
As the BBC explains, BP no longer stands for “Beyond Petroleum.” Instead, it’s slashing investments in alt-energy and returning to the drill bit:
Five years ago, chief executive Bernard Looney, who was in charge at the time, accelerated that process with ambitious targets to cut oil and gas production 40% by 2030, while massively ramping up investment in wind and solar. Today, BP could stand for "Back to Petroleum" following its announcement to shift back to oil and gas production and slash investment in renewables. (Emphasis added.)
BP is (finally!) coming to its senses. Last summer, it halted new investments in offshore wind. In December, BP’s head of offshore wind projects left the company. In a nice bit of honest reporting, the BBC notes that there is “simply less money in renewables than in oil and gas and some BP shareholders have become angry and impatient” as other multinational oil companies, including Shell and Exxon, are producing far bigger profits. The BBC also explains that BP’s move away from alt-energy “follows rivals’ Shell and Norwegian company Equinox scaling back plans to invest in green energy.”
It has taken a while, but some of Europe’s biggest companies and top politicians are abandoning the alt-energy mirage and are embracing energy realism. Need more proof? The new German coalition government is signaling it will restart the country’s idled nuclear reactors. As Alex Kaufman explained here on Substack, “Nuclear energy may be the big winner,” of the recent German elections. He notes that the Christian Democratic Union and Christian Social Union have vowed to “stick with the nuclear option.” Further, incoming German Chancellor Friedrich Merz called for a “nuclear dismantling moratorium,” which, as Mark Nelson noted on Twitter/X, should pave the way for the country to restart its reactors.
Things in Europe are changing. The next obvious policy change is for Britain to start drilling and fracking for natural gas. Alas, don’t hold your breath on that.
Before you go:
Please click that ♡ button, subscribe, and share. Thanks.
Also, comments on this posting are open to free and paid subscribers alike.
What a great presentation! You are a terrific speaker and the message is so powerful. I think we are starting to win and you deserve much of the credit for turning things around. Trump and Elon are helping a bit, too, but you guys who have been in the trenches all these years deserve credit as well. Again great presentation!
Thank you, Robert, for all your contributions to the world of energy realism.
NetZero is a dead man walking. No matter how much caterwauling is heard from climate calamitists, the public needs to know that there are no viable plans to power the world without thermal generation.
Alarmists love to spend their days hashing out AGW minutiae…but will rarely engage on response plans except to call anyone expecting a detailed response plan a “Denier.”