Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Marnie's avatar

Thanks for this!

My husband's grandmother, Marika, who lived in the Pindos mountains of Greece, spent much of her life washing clothes by hand, washing dishes, hauling water with a donkey from the local spring, rounding up firewood, and raising five children. Her village was gradually electrified in the 1970s and 80s, but by that time, she was already a grandmother. She too was very smart, but given the demand for physical labor, education was out of reach.

Even in my own lifetime here in Western North America, the development of highly reliable dishwashers and integrated washer/dryer machines have further reduced the burden of labor on women.

Still, some things don't change. Childcare is still labor intensive and rewarding. I'm happy I got an advanced degree in electrical engineering, and love working as an electronics design engineer, but I would not have traded away the years I spent as a stay-at-home mom to have had a CV that has the work profile of a man.

Expand full comment
Brynjo's avatar

It is so naive, if not evil, to close down low cost nuclear and nat gas power in the name of helping people or globe.

Doublely naive when one realizes that replacements for these, ie coal, lead to higher co2 in atmosphere.

Another impact of closing down clean conventional energy is demand suppression through higher costs electricity, or blackouts. This has even great social damage.

In “wealthy” locals like California and NY, the damage is mostly economic, as budgets for teachers’ salaries, community housing, and gifted students programs and graduate programs at top state universities are impinged, or taxes on employers and innovative corporations increased.

But as Bengali story implies, in rural undeveloped locals, the burden of making cheap electricity unattainable is far more than economic, it impacts society, culture and social justice.

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts