72 Comments

Y'all parrot O&G propaganda without thinking, lol

Expand full comment

Modern appliances burning NG at point of use lose about 15% of the energy up the flue.

Converting NG to electricity loses about 20% up the stack and 50% out the cooling tower - 70% wasted before it even leaves the plant site.

Really^4 dumb!!

Expand full comment

Does anyone remember when the government was supposed to serve the people, rather than manage us? Thank heavens we still have the courts.

Expand full comment

What a tragedy that the gas Luddites are able to muster regulatory support. Every year electrification is delayed, is a nail in the earth’s coffin. Thanks for the interesting post.

Expand full comment

you can't be serious?

Expand full comment

This is conflating different issues: Grid reliability, electrical generation expansion, and the mix of different types of electrical generation.

I agree with most of what Robert writes. But the 'chicken little' screeching about not being able to expand electrical generation capacity quickly or ensure grid reliability is disproved by Robert's home state of Texas.

Texas has grown it’s electrical grid by 40% over the past 18 years to accommodate the millions of people moving here from ‘blue’ states. In the past 5 years alone, Texas installed capacity to the power grid has increased 24%.

Texas did it with natural gas, wind, and solar. Coal is phasing out. Implying or outright asserting we can’t grow the grid quickly enough is not supported by the facts. (yes, we did experience the ‘snowpocolypse’ in February of 2021 (Winter Storm Uri), but that was a crisis of lack of winterizing the grid, not lack of generating capacity. Texas has made great progress in hardening the grid.)

How the Texas power grid is changing, according to 6 charts (houstonchronicle.com)

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/energy/article/power-grid-change-charts-18561690.php

Electrical generation, grid reliability, and electrical generation mix (natural gas, coal, nuclear, solar, wind, hydroelectric, biomass, etc) are matters of political will, not matters of science.

Texas has succeeded by adding massive amounts of natural gas AND wind power to its grid over the past 2 decades, all while shutting down many coal-fired plants. And my cost per kWh in Fort Worth is just 9¢/kWh vs. 32¢/kWh in California. Right now, a new residential contract for 2 years of fixed rate electicity is $11¢/kWh in Texas: https://powertochoose.org

With the growth of huge battery packs (ie Tesla Megapacks) for storing wind and solar energy, the grid can easily grow using natural gas, wind, and solar as baseloads. We've just now reached the start of massive battery production for storing wind and solar. Five years from now, no one will be talking about 'unreliable' wind and solar.

Nuclear as a baseload is great, but until the regulatory dogs are called off, and until a standardized, mass-produced fission unit is agreed upon, nuclear is not feasible.

Growing generation capacity with wind, solar, and natural gas has been Texas' recipe. Texas will continue to grow capacity and grid reliability with that same mix. Don't let the fear mongers on the left or right fool you.

Expand full comment

Wind and solar can not be baseloads since they are not 24/7 energy sources. "Five years from now, no one will be talking about 'unreliable' wind and solar." those words will be regretful. Battery technology is not even close to what is required for a "green" electric grid.

Expand full comment

You are wrong. Quit listening or reading sources that only validate your opinion. Read sources that show other sides of the story.

I didn't miss out on TSLA in 2019 because I read what they were doing, not what talking heads were saying. Musk seemed like a flaming liberal to me, but I saw he actually knew how to capitalize on the EV credits being offered to everyone (GM, Ford, Stellantis). People on this site might not like EV credits, but they are a fact of life now, with no clear path to remove them in the next 10 years.

Right now, China is experiencing a glut of battery capacity and the cost of Lithium Carbonate has dropped significantly because it is oversupplied. Batteries like Tesla's megapacks are dropping in price as battery producers are looking to find a use for their excess capacity. There is so many new battery production plants in the pipeline it's crazy. And Lithium supply is growing at an incredible rate.

https://cnevpost.com/2024/01/17/battery-price-war-catl-byd-costs-down/

Wind and Solar will become baseload in many parts of the world, including the United States:

According to the EIA, as of March 2024, there were 1,654 MW of battery storage capacity in operation, and another 10,852 MW of planned or proposed capacity in the United States.

According to IRENA, as of 2023, there were 8.5 GWh of battery storage capacity installed worldwide, and another 14.6 GWh of announced or contracted capacity.

Batteries used to back up intermittent energy sources are growing at an exponential rate. Don't let yourself miss out on the investment opportunities available because of whichever tribe you with to belong to.

Expand full comment

Well thanks for not responding to my critique but going on a diatribe about EV credits and Elon Musk (huh?). Seems like you are buying into the hype being spewed by the govt agencies, NGO's and businesses that are making money on weak technology that are not the solution. Furthermore, I am an electrical engineer with 40 years of experience and I am fully aware of the technical challenges presented by green energy and modern day battery technology and neither of them are anywhere near providing us with sustainable and reliable energy source. I also read a wide variety of engineering documents (not PC, Woke or other political pieces like ones pushed by the Greenies who are math and science and engineering illiterate). You may not know that it took decades to bring Li-ion battery tech from the lab to mass production (decades not years) and this time frame is typical for new technologies. I have worked in tech startups and have seen first hand that it’s a very difficult and arduous journey. Lay people get way too optimistic on what it takes to deploy new technologies to the masses at low cost, let alone replacing an entire electric grid that also took decades to build. Some are still waiting for the flying car which were coming soon as told to us in the 1960’s.

Expand full comment

I gave you sources and statistics.

You gave an opinionated diatribe.

I know how long it took for lithium to become abundant and affordable and practical. 40 years.

Just like I know how long it took for ICE engines, Federal Highways, Refineries, and gasoline stations to transform the U.S. 60 years. I am grateful beyond measure for that long, hard-fought success. (Investment in mid-steam energy companies is what guaranteed me a comfortable retirement.

I have worked with many great engineers. And many bad ones. The good ones supported their work and gave unbiased assessments. The bad ones thought they were smarter than everyone else and just tried to cite their credentials.

I have no idea which one you are, but you did nothing to counter the statistics, facts, and sources I cited. I'll let those following this conversation decide.

Expand full comment

Spent a month in Arizona chilling, relaxing, getting some sun and warmth for my old bones and getting away from -30 weather. My home base after landing in Phoenix was Ehrenberg which is a short 10 minutes drive from the California state border via Hwy 10 the main arterial highway between Phoenix and California. My friend and I stayed close to Ehrenberg except for a one trip to: Yuma to check out Alcodones, Palm Desert to go to the Apple Store for phone repairs, Parker to hit Walmart & have drinks at the Desert Bar and lastly Oatman to experience the old Mining/Cowboy town and it’s famous Burrows and bed races.

Wait, it's coming....

I was amazed, mesmerized and then baffled by the amount of Semi-truck traffic I witnessed between Ehrenberg and the cities we travelled to the month of January 2024. On one of the last trips into Quartzite, I decided that besides having already videoed the semi traffic a few times during other trips, I would actually ‘count’ Semi’s. The thought didn’t come to me until we were well on our way, but I did count 218 by the turn off to Ehrenberg, which is a total distance of 12 miles if you count the entire trip.

However, I started counting well into our drive and counted 218 semi’s in say 10 miles! If they were to be all electric and all stop as some point to ‘plug in’ how would this work on the electrical grid. Keep in mind the traffic is going in both directions, I counted traffic coming towards us not both ways.)

The truck stops and rest stops have room for 50 trucks.....

Is this not crazy scary? Over 400 semi’s going both ways in a 10 mile stretch. It was also after 6 pm late afternoon and already dark.

So if there are 200 semi’s for every 10 miles of Hwy between Pheonix and California, and they all become ELECTRIC, where is the power coming from.

It is 150 miles from Pheonix and California. 150 /10 = 15 blocks of 10m miles; X 200 semis, 3000 trucks travelling one way between Phoenix and California; at that 10 mile time period!!. How would all 6000 trucks (moving both ways) all plug in to the electrical system each night or when required. This is one stretch of Hwy between two States.

I am not sure how one would do the math for every major highway artery between cities in the US to calculate the truck numbers and I won’t even attempt to suggest it could be done. But, or so it would seem impossible to calculate the power the required through out the US to compensate for the electrification of semi truck travel.

I conclude it is mathematically impossible. It’s all lies and rubbish. It is just not going to happen, Not in my life time.

Time for the two biggest ‘movers of goods’, Walmart and Amazon to speak the truth !!

PS: It pretty warm in Arizona…try moving goods via electric semi-truck in cold weather states during winter ?

Expand full comment

The recent cold snap here in western canada shows how useless the renewables are, at night and below -30c no solar and no wind, the virtue propellers are turned off to prevent catastrophic failure.

Now that the climate/insane have tied themselves down claiming that co2 emissions also cause breakouts of polar air, an idiotic thought, we now know these will become more common where there are zero renewables available for a long period

Expand full comment

The forces pushing a "green energy transition" are distracting us from what we really need, which is an energy *reduction* transition.

Expand full comment

"If climate change means we are facing more extreme weather of all types, the last thing we should do is make our grid more dependent on the weather."

This is the best sentence I have ever read on the lunacy of the netzero movement. You have destroyed their argument in one sentence. If only they were smart enough to realize it. But facts & common sense aren't part of their narrative, so let the circular firing squads continue to operate. FANTASTIC post! 🤘😎🤘

Expand full comment

Big decision by the 9th circuit. I’m surprised I’ve seen zilch about this in traditional media… but should I be?!

Expand full comment

Obviously the grid needs to be upgraded also. Thus blog post and the generally admiring comments seem to ignore the climate crisis. If we don’t wean ourselves off of gas for heating buildings, along with other steps (greening the grid, electrifying transportation, etc) what would be your plan for mitigating the climate crisis?

Expand full comment

It is not a crisis, yes the climate is slowly warming but even their most extreme forecasts (1.5C more warning by 2100) do not result in a crisis. We as humans can easily adapt to the slowly changing climate. Look how foolish Al Gore's movie about the mythical end of the earth looks today in 2024, according to him the planet should already be way worse off than it is. So yes climate "scientists" have a perfect record of prognostication - 100% wrong and I see no change in sight. Global Warming, now climate change, is big business and sometimes the only source of income for Climate science and if you want your business to thrive and continue with more govt or NGO funding you have to tow the line and only talk about the catastrophe of climate change. Isn't it odd to you that no one ever tells you about the positive side of global warming? Everything has pros and cons except for Climate change which apparently only has cons and con artists!

Expand full comment

There is no climate crisis.

Expand full comment

What climate crisis?

The data shows it doesn’t exist.

Expand full comment

Meantime, in the auto market, the company that was branded a laggard by the EV lobby now emerges as the clear consumer choice: https://www.wsj.com/business/earnings/toyota-motor-reports-rise-in-quarterly-net-profit-as-sales-grew-5324042e

Expand full comment

How anyone that is cooking professionally can sit idly by in these circumstances is distressing. The sheer inefficiency of carrying "heat" over electrical wires is retarded. And then to assert that these appliances are a better alternative, which they are already claiming, is just another Rocky Mountain High fabrication. Pissing on the sunk costs of having the most reliable gas distribution system on the planet is on a par with Germany proudly destroying its nuclear fleet. How these people feel empowered to ruin the well being of their neighbors is jaw dropping. And, of course, just to make it all more laughable, electricity in California depends massively on natural gas. (47%) Luckily we've driven out all of our in-state production of hydrocarbons and nearly eliminated our safest form of energy, better known as nuclear, so we can all sleep much better knowing we are fighting the "good for nothing" fight. Our kids already feel like we've "destroyed" their world by being selfish, wait till they figure out we actually destroyed their world by being foolish.

Expand full comment

Keep thinking and talking. The more of us, the better.

Expand full comment

Our current (pun intended!) electric grid is just one EMP away from a National Disaster. Look around where you live! Those transmission substations behind the chain-link fences take years to build once the designs are finalized. You don't just go buy those transformers at a hardware store.

ONE EMP will take out several of those in a given radius, depending on the nature of the device targeting a given location. It'll take months, maybe years to rebuild what was destroyed in a moment.

Putting our entire economic well-being in one "basket" of energy supply is suicidal. Heck even now when it gets cold the current grid is stressed just short of failure. It was years ago when a single squirrel put the lights out over the entire northeast for several hours. Can't charge your EV 'cause the power's been disrupted? Tough luck!

Expand full comment

The ‘electrify everything’ dark money people want to destroy America. They are all smart enough to know what that will do to our grid. They also know wind and solar are unreliable. Question is. Why are they doing this?

Expand full comment

god forbid we actually INVEST in a clean power infrastructure. Ooooh electrification dark money? Can you spell projection propaganda and hypocrisy? Only the fossil fuel stakeholders are pure as the driven snow, pristine in their concern for the well-being of the masses? Don’t be stupid.

Expand full comment

This isn't about investing in a clean power infrastructure this is about forcing US citizens to only have electricity for all services, power, heating, transportation, etc in their lives. This is establishing a single point of failure, the electric grid, and everything is shut down. An attack on the electric grid or some disaster and everything is down. An engineer would never ever put all its energy sources in one basket only a fool would do that. And to claim this is fighting global warming is an insult to our intelligence. So if we implement this insane policy over the entire USA how much impact will it have on the Earths climate? Will it more than 0.01C? Probably not, no one can even feel 0.1C or 0.2C let alone 10x less than this. This is fascism, marxism whatever you want it call it in which govt dictates our choices but it sure as heck isn't freedom and liberty and allowing people a choice.

Expand full comment

If you actually think emissions are a problem and don’t want us to freeze to death then start lobbying for nuclear.

Everything is a pointless waste of time.

Expand full comment

Nobody is as stupid as you think they are. Clean energy costs too much, isn't really clean, won't affect the climate and is making big corporations and their minions rich. Nobody is pure. The difference is that fossil fuel works, and it is a bargain compared to cheap wind and solar.

Expand full comment