25 Comments

This relevant article by veteran energy professional Donn Dears focuses on the security risks of offshoring production of "Tier 1" very large transformers at substations and large generators:

Are Transformers a National Security Risk?

https://ddears.com/2023/04/04/are-transformers-a-national-security-risk/#comment-7816

April 4, 2023

Please also read the 14 comments posted in only 3 days.

Expand full comment

Perfection is the enemy of the good!

Expand full comment

Demand for transformers is up, so prices are up. More at 11.

The trouble is there's no competitive market, and everyone wants to blame something else. But until the people of Tennessee decide they don't want the TVA, not sure where the competitive market for grid transformers is. We've got a bunch of regional monopolies and the complaints here would be better put at the feet of all these people you talk to in the industry that want to blame something else.

Expand full comment

Yeah, ideological capture affects us all. And once reason becomes secondary to a chosen position it's very difficult to shake that loose. I see it in everyone including myself.

Expand full comment

Important stuff here, Robert. Thank you for your voice. insights and leadership. Heard today: "Utilities are - effectively - a tax on people and businesses". Higher energy volatility = prices power ahead. CFOs at commercial and industrial cos w/ high-energy use need new "Power Operations Strategy", teams & services to make sense of REC, PPAs, wholesale power, audits +. Are you seeing companies who are prepared/preparing intelligently, meaning addressing the "green" that $hareholder$ care about and the "green" initiatives that the sustainability/stakeholder folks care about?

Expand full comment

We have a Strategic Petroleum Reserve to guard against political, economic, weather, and wartime upsets in this crucial energy source. We are bare naked to upsets to the crucial electric power transmission and distribution source. We need to build inventories of transformers and switchgear, both for resilience and for rising power demand, along with more domestic manufacturing capacity.

Expand full comment

Too many politicians think electricity can be delivered wirelessly like a cell phone signal. If you polled them about where most power comes from, the leading answers would be "wind," "solar," and "the plug on the wall."

Expand full comment

My dad gave me my first pun when I was twelve years old: "Never start a vast project with half-vast plans."

The Greta Green Energy Transition dwarfs the Apollo program, the Interstate Highway System, and Johnson's War on Poverty and Great Society, combined.

I asked politicians from county to Federal, and the DOE, for a copy of the report of the comprehensive quantitative life-cycle system engineering study of the transition. Nobody was even polite enough to reply "We do not have such a report."

The transition is impossible. I wrote a little bit about this in articles at https://vsnyder.substack.com, mostly summarizing other's works.

Expand full comment

Wrote about the Apollo Program and “moonshots” awhile ago https://greenleapforward.substack.com/p/moonshots

Expand full comment

Very nice article. These types of government mandated cost increases and inefficiencies are rampant throughout every industry and sub-sector. Just imagine how much we could do to get inflation under control if we had an administration that made it a focus to get rid of, or at least prune back, the useless, cost increasing, efficiency killing, rapacious regulatory state?

Expand full comment

Mr. Bryce, thank you for a nicely written discussion on utility prices, but I have a question. Early in your piece, you reference an editorial earlier this week from the Wall Street Journal about the "true" cost of the IRA. That editorial, which I also studied, referenced a report from Goldman Sachs describing their research.

My question is this: Do you have a direct reference to the Goldman Sachs report? In my studies, I prefer to use direct evidence rather than 2nd party.

Thank you.

Expand full comment

Nice piece Robert. It’ll get noticed.

I live in a new development. New transformers, underground wires, fed by a looped 12kv circuit out of a single unit 3 phase 60 kV substation 5 miles away. If all my neighbors buy an electric car, every piece of wire, every transformer will need to be replaced, the circuit to the substation will need to be re-conductored and the substation will need to be enlarged and another unit added. I don’t know about the HV feeder to the sub.

Apparently with costs and lead limes we should order the equipment now.

Expand full comment

Very well written and I love how you explained some of the technical challenges.

The bottom line is this: the ‘green’ transition is a politically mandated, centralized planned and designed to reshape the entire economy.

History shows that never works and always backfires.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

How is pointing out that unreasonable regulations like forcing obsolescence of existing transformer technology (desperately needed by your beloved clean energy) to save 1% in efficiency is disinformation? Without these transformers your 20% inefficient electric vehicles will be unusable, so more 90% inefficient ICE vehicles will need to be kept in use.

Expand full comment

I’m seeing this exact thing in my industry. I work in the industrial chemical sector on the gulf coast and lead time on a 3-phase transformer bank (pole mounted) is 10-12 months! Not too long ago it was about 1-2 months and now we’re being forced to get very creative. It’s the same story with a prefabricated substation we are procuring that has a lead time of about 80 weeks. It has made my job quite difficult and will not stop if the push for electrification continues without any reality. Thanks for your reporting, sir!

Expand full comment

Have you ever known IOU's to be philanthropic organizations?

Expand full comment

I default back to The First Law of Thermodynamics :

Energy Cannot be Created or Destroyed, only Transformed.

In this case, there is a pun.

The "Renewables Crowd" ignores the basic laws of physics and thermodynamics, which is creating a fiasco of unprecedented proportions.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Hello Jeff,

Respectfully, you just verified my comment.

One must take into account the cradle to grave life-cycle of so called renewables and their fueling and maintenence along the way.

This goes for everything in our physical world.

You should seriously contemplate the First and Second Law of Thermodynamics and integrate.

You will perhaps find that wind, solar, EVs, batteries also must follow the Laws of Physics and Thermodynamics.

They are big net losers, and create more environmental destruction from cradle to grave.

Finally, take a look at E=mc^2. That will key you in to the energy source with the greatest energy density and safety.

Expand full comment

Good article describing what is in store for us over the next few years. It prove once again, bureaucracy is not your friend. The overzealous scheme to save a particle of carbon at any price is the most fiscally destructive mythology our world has ever seen, better said as 'the most fiscally destruct the public has yet to grasp. If we did see it, our voting pattern might be altered a bit. And we'd see Al Gore on the comer with a tin cup.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Whoever "Removed" is seems to not fully understand the gaping holes in the green energy and electrify-everything math, at least that's what it appears like based on the responses to his/her now empty comments. I wonder why so many people wedge themselves into Substack to take on a largely intelligent, well informed group of people to tell them they're luddites and green is amazing! As ever, the utopians have the same problem bedeviling democratic socialists/marxists/communists; it doesn't matter how wonderful a system appears on paper if it's a catastrophe in the real world.

Expand full comment

Chris, agreed. Although in this particular case the post that Jeff made was deleted by whoever monitors the page as was another that I was commenting on, in that case my comment, partially written became meaningless. That said, the, 'gaping holes in green logic' now become 'gaping holes in a thread.' And,...

Robert's page may not be the place to offer a philosophical observation on a human being but, each mind is unique in that the flow of information and what lodges there. all of us treat what sticks as knowledge. All of us build our own model of the real world and that is what we disagree on, what our arguments are based on. That each of us fervently believe in the correctness of what we believe is both obvious and inevitable. when we truly think we're wrong , we change our minds. And the real world cares not a whiff ... it just is and if we get to that stage of thinking, the model of the world we hold dear will continually improve in accuracy.

Expand full comment

Politely, I disagree.

Expand full comment